It shouldn't take 64 lines of code to do something really simple

Re:It shouldn't take 64 lines of code to do something really... by jrockway on Monday October 03, 2011 @12:29AM (#3065053)

Ironically, at work we buy a bunch of BLS datasets from a third-party vendor. Their format is even worse: an opaque binary database and a win32 DLL that reads it. 1000 lines of Haskell later, it sort of works...

(This is mostly because they chose to represent dates as integers, and they have four possible date types: yearly, quarterly, monthly, and daily. 1901, in their exciting world, could mean "year 1901" or it could mean "month January 1919". That's nice work, Lou.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:It shouldn't take 64 lines of code to do something really... by lurker19 on Monday October 03, 2011 @07:24AM (#3065857)

Sounds like Excel.

Where do you work that uses Haskell in the office?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:It shouldn't take 64 lines of code to do something really... by jrockway on Monday October 03, 2011 @05:44PM (#3068242)

I work for BofA, but I'm pretty sure I'm the only one that uses Haskell.

I used Haskell because I hate Windows, and Haskell lets me do all my work in a maximized Emacs session without having to install anything other than Emacs and the Haskell Platform. "When life gives you Windows, don't make lemonade. Use Haskell."

[ Parent | on HN ]