Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol...
by Lascaille on Friday March 11, 2022 @05:05AM
(#30638176)
>Hotels don’t make money if you stay in the room, it actually costs them money in terms of electricity.
No, them renting the room to you - when you'll usually be out of it most of the day - is absolutely how they make money. Maybe in Las Vegas the room rate is a loss leader but your average business hotel is 100% making their profit on the room.
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol...
by daniel-cussen on Friday March 11, 2022 @06:21AM
(#30638591)
That's my kind of hotel, just a business that makes their money on exactly what the fuck it looks like they're making the money on.
I once stayed at a place that had super, super cheap refreshment rates on the mini-fridge. Cheaper if you got them at a store obviously, but not punishing like most other hotels, less than double the supermarket rate. Guess what? I made them tons of money, it was super convenient, I didn't go out of my way to avoid them.
Re:Twitter makes it harder to choose the old reverse-chronol...
by zarzavat on Friday March 11, 2022 @06:53AM
(#30638784)
What I mean is the hotel doesn’t make more money if you stay inside the room, which was GP’s premise that they would want to entice guests into spending more hours in the room. They would prefer that guests leave the room and go to the bar or restaurant for instance.
There was a case a few years ago where a Marriott got fined for blocking outside wifi.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/oct/03/marriott-fin...