Re:Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel (2017)
by Gravityloss on Thursday March 10, 2022 @07:06AM
(#30626003)
Hydrocarbon fuels are a lot more energy dense than batteries or hydrogen (with tankage), so they are needed for things like long distance flight for now.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel (2017)
by dahfizz on Thursday March 10, 2022 @07:50AM
(#30626324)
They also make for great storage. Using solar to make a hydrocarbon fuel which is turned into electricity in our existing fossil fuel infrastructure seems way more plausible than spending trillions on batteries or pumped hydro.
Re:Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel (2017)
by enrgtw2022 on Thursday March 10, 2022 @07:47AM
(#30626288)
Yep.
Batteries aren't great for super-cold areas. Pure hydrogen, my understanding is that it's pretty much impossible to make a 'leak free' tank. So for things like backup power generation there is an additional challenge. More thinking about need to top off than risks, I'm not qualified to speak to whether such a tank would be a risk.
Re:Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel (2017)
by fsh on Thursday March 10, 2022 @09:01AM
(#30626959)
I don't think that leakage is a serious issue in high-pressure hydrogen storage. The tanks used in hydrogen fuel cell vehicles have leakage rates of a few mL/minute [1]. The first generation Toyota Mirai has a storage capacity of 85000 standard liters of hydrogen. It would take tens of years to leak out a significant fraction of that.
[1] https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42154-020-00096-z
Re:Directly converting CO2 into a gasoline fuel (2017)
by Gravityloss on Thursday March 10, 2022 @09:00AM
(#30626951)
Right battery chemistries with right thermal management and especially right software would work well also in cold climates. Bjørn Nyland from Norway tests a lot of this stuff on youtube.