Re:When was the last time 98% of scientists got something im...
by 0x20cowboy on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @11:31PM
(#30623239)
It would be cool if Hackernews did some kind of debate / in-depth discussion / podcast / video cast thing where some of these topics could be discussed. I would love to hear a nuanced, technical / economic discussion about this and other topics. Heck, I would even pay to hear it.
I have no real experience with academia, but the fact that I (as a layperson) can’t even get access to published papers is a pretty clear indication that they have little interest in making information available.
If only there was a website where entrepreneurs…
Re:When was the last time 98% of scientists got something im...
by wittycardio on Thursday March 10, 2022 @12:07AM
(#30623424)
Do you have any proof that dissent is toxic to one's career in science today ? Any more so than it ever was ?
Re:When was the last time 98% of scientists got something im...
by freedomben on Saturday March 12, 2022 @06:39PM
(#30656177)
Nope, just anecdotal stuff. I could definitely be wrong, but it sure seems like it's a lot more common. It's possible that it's just more visible to me now.
It would be fascinating to see some data on this, although I can't think of how you could quantify it when "dissent" is such an ambiguous and subjective term.
Now that said, there is a real problem of incentives in academia. The way funding is procured, and the way peer review currently works, is causing serious issues. Any sort of dissent has also become toxic to one's career, creating a heavy incentive not to challenge any established "knowledge."