News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by uxcolumbo on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @04:40PM (#30620373)
For anybody considering getting a dog - please consider adopting rather than buying.

• You’re Saving A Life

Adopting a dog from a shelter not only means that you’re giving him a happy life, but you also free up a spot at the rescue or shelter to save another dog’s life.

• Helps Fight Puppy Mills

Approximately 90% of puppies you can buy in pet stores or online are from puppy mills. Adopting a dog from a shelter takes business away from mills. The more people who adopt, the more puppy mills have a hard time staying in business.

More reasons: https://www.caninejournal.com/adopt-dont-shop/

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by vgel on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @05:56PM (#30621081)
Except every dog adoption place around here has requirements like "Must be an experienced dog owner, have a 5 acre yard, own your home, and be able to do 50 push-ups without getting out of breath. Expert sword-swallowers preferred."
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by chockchocschoir on Thursday March 10, 2022 @08:56AM (#30626908)
Ok, so the above recommendation doesn't work for you, just ignore it then.

What you are saying doesn't apply everywhere, and I doubt it applies in most places around the world, since shelters usually have way too many dogs and would love to be able to find anyone to care for them before they have to effectively execute them.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by zanellato19 on Thursday March 10, 2022 @11:39AM (#30628881)
I got my current dog from simply showing and saying "I want that one" and then signing a paper saying I won't abuse him.
[dead]
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by munificent on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @07:24PM (#30621787)
Also, if you care about the environment, don't have children. And, really, best to off yourself as well. Might want to take down a few less enlightened folks with you when you go.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by arbitrary_name on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @09:21PM (#30622536)
What an odd response. Did the prior post upset you in some way? Not having dogs and children are both reasonable and moral responses to the climate crisis. Suicide and murder are not.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by munificent on Thursday March 10, 2022 @01:52AM (#30623861)
> Did the prior post upset you in some way?

There is a perspective I see sometimes where some people have elevated environmentalism so high in their value system relative to all else that they end up in a moral position where consuming any resources at all which all living things do is somehow morally unconscionable.

My comment sounds like a joke, but it's not far off: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voluntary_Human_Extinction_Mov...

Reasonable environmentalists think humans have as much right to exist and seek joy as any other living being as long as it's done in a sustainable way. We just want people to, you know, maybe walk to work instead of driving sometimes. Don't litter. Push your government to pass laws against pollution.

There are lobbyists and well-funded organizations pushing against any progress on the environment and the existence of extreme views like "you're a horrible person if you —checks notes—have a fucking dog" makes it too easy for those groups to paint all environmentalists as out of touch kooks. That's the last thing we need.

The parent comment described pet ownership as "is among the biggest environmental stupidity I can think of". Call me crazy, but a couple of meaty snacks for Fido is pretty far down the list after, I don't know, carbon emissions, greenhouse gases, coral bleaching, acid rain, deforestation, fuel oil, fracking, chemical dumping, nuclear weapons, water table draining, etc.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by slightwinder on Thursday March 10, 2022 @04:04AM (#30624799)
> Reasonable environmentalists think humans have as much right to exist

There is a right to exist, but not a right to be created. Saying someone should kill themselves and kill some other along the way, is just not acceptable in a normal discussion.

> Call me crazy, but a couple of meaty snacks for Fido is pretty far down the list after

Those meaty snacks make 20% of worldwide meat-consumption. As a country, pets would be the 60th biggest CO2-emitter in the world. Just because there are bigger culprits, doesn't mean that the smaller ones are excused. Moving pets to more friendly foods would have a huge impact on the world.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by munificent on Thursday March 10, 2022 @01:53PM (#30630859)
> There is a right to exist, but not a right to be created.

But the top-level post is advocating adopting shelter animals and the reply was that keeping pets is bad for the environment. Those shelter animals already exist and if they aren't adopted, they will likely be killed. It's the same thing modulo different species.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by trevcanhuman on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @10:13PM (#30622841)
Why are they not ? This is more of an ethical dilemma. I agree with @ munificient. I could probably list a lot of things that do a lot of bad for the environment.

But making everything hyper-efficient and reducing on EVERYTHING we almost possibly do just takes away our basic freedoms. I'm not saying you're wrong about not having dogs. I have one myself but yeah, you're right. It's like having a child. But I like being able to choose having it or not.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by cgriswald on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @06:49PM (#30621518)
> The idea that we grow food to feed cattle or fish to feed pets is among the biggest environmental stupidity I can think of.

The meats that dogs and cats eat are essentially the waste products from meat production aimed at human consumption. You can certainly find some exceptions (especially on Instragram), but the vast, vast majority of people, even those feeding raw diets to their pets, use either meat not meant for human consumption or offal that most Americans don't consume.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by raffraffraff on Thursday March 10, 2022 @02:17AM (#30623995)
The choice is: "Not rescuing a dog from the pound" vs what? ..."leaving them there to wait a few more weeks/months in a cage before being put to sleep"?

Nah. Have you ever bonded with a dog? Nah. I'll take dogs over people any day.

I'm all for closing puppy mills/farms, neutering etc but I draw the line at "don't rescue a dog that already exists"

Even premium dog kibble is made out of the lowest quality junk meat left over from what people eat. I too am a vegetarian (and I don't have kids, and have never owned a car and gave up flying years ago). But I do not begrudge my two hounds their bag of kibble. I'm fact I'd be willing to bet that my household CO² footprint is lower than yours, even with my two greyhounds.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by froddd on Thursday March 10, 2022 @02:09AM (#30623950)
> The idea that we grow food to feed cattle or fish to feed pets is among the biggest environmental stupidity I can think of.

That is the wildest exaggeration I can think of.

I’m also vegetarian, though I am because I’d rather not kill things when I don’t need to. The environmental benefit is an appreciable side effect, and confirms to me I’ve made the right choice for myself. I like to try to share my views with as many people as I can, but I think expecting everyone to ‘just get it’ is setting yourself up for failure, and ultimately unhelpful in the long run.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by schwartzworld on Thursday March 10, 2022 @08:41AM (#30626759)
If you're adopting a rescue animal, there is no environmental argument. My dog was bred for racing, a cruel and violent industry that throws the dogs away like garbage when they are no longer used. I don't think there's any ethical argument to be made against adopting a dog like that.

If people giving their cats cat food is enough to make you question your commitment to vegetarianism, maybe you're not really that committed? You should do things for yourself, and base their value on the decisions of others

[dead]
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by raffraffraff on Thursday March 10, 2022 @02:23AM (#30624058)
As I've said elsewhere, I do not drive, fly, eat meat or have kids. My laptop is a 8 years, my phone is a repairable FP3 which has had several parts replaced over the last 3 years. And yes, I rescued two greyhounds from a cruel fate, and I feed them kibble (reconstituted / recovered meat). I have zero problem with the latter, and still call myself am environmentalist.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by epolanski on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @06:38PM (#30621439)
I have long ago learned that most care about environment as long as it doesn't impact their life and what they like.

Makes people feel uneasy.

Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by munificent on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @07:25PM (#30621791)
I mean... should people not be able to like things?
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by jiscariot on Thursday March 10, 2022 @07:29AM (#30626160)
Spend 50k on a Tesla and you get to enhance you lifestyle, signal your eco-solidarity and to some extent, affluence. Bang for buck, if you really care about the environment, don't have children. There is nothing that comes close to impact.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by lghh on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @11:18PM (#30623172)
Have you considered the environmental impact of using this site? It’s certainly not free.
Re:Some tiny personal programs I've written by stjohnswarts on Thursday March 10, 2022 @02:27AM (#30624105)
that's what I'm thinking if you want to suck all the joy out of life just move to the woods and live off the land, have the least environment impact possible