News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Great Cul-De-Sac Problem And How To Alleviate It. by potatolicious on Saturday October 01, 2011 @11:14PM (#3061933)
> "but when I lived in the 'burbs it was on a 1/2 acre lot behind a nature preserve"

If this was a typical American suburb, I'd be inclined to agree, but you have to realize that your suburb is a statistical anomaly compared to the much more urban suburb that most Americans live in.

For most Americans, a suburb still means being miles from nature, it also means being jammed into row after row of houses butting shoulders with your neighbors. The "true suburb" (i.e., a suburb as it was originally envisioned) is a rare thing.

For these "urban 'burbs" there is really no benefit to the current layout of meandering streets and cul de sacs - it just forces people to drive more, disconnects neighborhoods, and makes transit impossible to provision. There would be very little lost converting these to neighborhoods with a stronger retail presence and sanely laid out streets.

Re:The Great Cul-De-Sac Problem And How To Alleviate It. by enjo on Sunday October 02, 2011 @04:57AM (#3062408)
Original suburbs are generally now just called "the city". They are built on the city grid and generally have relatively high densities. The prototypical "street car suburbs" that surround the urban core of most cities where the first true suburbs.

Most of what we're building today are really "exurbs".