Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing parts of the app

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by spicybright on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @11:23AM (#30616276)

even if they buy less because of the bloated app, you're still balancing dev resources against profit margins. It might just not be worth the effort for that extra tiny bit of revenue the app will generate by being small.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by jessriedel on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @11:27AM (#30616352)

But that's my point about scale: if the revenue-vs-developer-time tradeoff makes it worth it for any company to make a good app, it will be worth it for Amazon. They are so huge that a 0.01% increase in sales translates to many millions of dollars per year.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by spicybright on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @11:36AM (#30616487)

Everything else they do also scales though. Not proportionally to each other, but I wouldn't be surprised if putting their devs on, say, better product recommendations is much more revenue than app size.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by jessriedel on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @01:34PM (#30618272)

Then they should hire more devs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by spicybright on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @05:04PM (#30620580)

Again, the cost is likely not be worth it.

It would also be foolish to think we know the answers of how to make amazon more money from our comfy arm chairs.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Android: Freeing up 60% of storage for apps by removing p... by ipaddr on Wednesday March 09, 2022 @12:41PM (#30617597)

The push to get everyone on the company app will be less so. Why they want everyone on the app I don't understand but whatever those reasons are they won't benefit from it

[ Parent | on HN ]