Re:Lead exposure in last century shrunk IQ scores of half of...
by throwaway0a5e on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @05:20PM
(#30608036)
edit: My analysis is clearly unwelcome here.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Lead exposure in last century shrunk IQ scores of half of...
by scns on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:22PM
(#30608756)
Gasoline is not big business? They had a "scientist" on staff, that proclaimed that leaded fuel was harmless. Who cares about paint, when there are millions of cars driving around blowing lead dust into the air? The (real) scientist who saw a connection needed years to prove it. By digging into the ice in the arctis he was able to prove, that the high lead levels where a recent phenomenon. The documentary Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey by Neil deGrasse Tyson [0] tells this story much better than i ever could and much more... Highly recommended!
Re:Lead exposure in last century shrunk IQ scores of half of...
by agentdrtran on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:11PM
(#30608635)
People doing what's best for them can be very evil for others, like the fact that buildings full of lead paint and lead-leaking pipes have not been fixed.
Re:Lead exposure in last century shrunk IQ scores of half of...
by rbanffy on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @06:54PM
(#30609073)
> buildings full of lead paint and lead-leaking pipes have not been fixed.
That’s because a few IQ points in black and poor people is not considered more important than not using tax money to solve the problem.
Arguably, the added IQ points times the number of people affected would most likely have a positive effect on the GDP and would pay for the fix in a couple decades.
That we even think that we’d need to do the math to justify it is deeply depressing.