Re:Solar Power/Batteries are 60% of planned new U.S. electri...
by gameswithgo on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @09:39AM
(#30600344)
When going for serious global scale stuff you put the panels in sunny places and run gigantic cables to the places it isn't sunny. Again, possible to do but massive scale infrastructure projects that take time, money, and political will.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Solar Power/Batteries are 60% of planned new U.S. electri...
by sdunwoody on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @09:46AM
(#30600441)
I'm not an expert at all when it comes to this sort of stuff, but don't you lose quite a high percentage of the electricity generated when you move it over the vast distances needed for that to work?
Re:Solar Power/Batteries are 60% of planned new U.S. electri...
by zionic on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @10:47AM
(#30601167)
>but don't you lose quite a high percentage of the electricity generated when you move it over the vast distances needed for that to work?
No. 1-2MV DC transmission lines can move power 3000+ miles at >97% efficiency.
This isn't directed at you, but I'm starting to get super frustrated with this myth that transporting electricity is inefficient. I see it almost everywhere these discussions take place and I don't know why.
Re:Solar Power/Batteries are 60% of planned new U.S. electri...
by sdunwoody on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @11:18AM
(#30601631)
No offence taken, I'm happy to learn! It seems like I need to go and do more reading about this.
I suppose efficiency aside, the next big problem(s) would be of a political nature? Having no control over your power supply (which is hosted in a foreign nation) is quite a big geopolitical risk?
Re:Solar Power/Batteries are 60% of planned new U.S. electri...
by gameswithgo on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @10:35AM
(#30600993)
You lose some but it is manageable, there are already private projects to do things like this, including undersea cables!