Re:The technological case against Bitcoin and blockchain
by ludamad on Monday March 07, 2022 @01:43PM
(#30591642)
The itch.io response here is uniquely abrasive in the field (although undeniably a sentiment some hold). I hope we don't think that's a good example of dialogue.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The technological case against Bitcoin and blockchain
by Lascaille on Monday March 07, 2022 @06:50PM
(#30594860)
They think and believe that something is simply a scam.
Why would you expect them to enter into dialogue with the scammers?
Re:The technological case against Bitcoin and blockchain
by ludamad on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @10:54PM
(#30610753)
This author presumably wants a dialogue, though? "database-key-provenance-as-art is always a scam" is a fine opinion, but I would have picked one with more nuance
Re:The technological case against Bitcoin and blockchain
by johnny_b_g on Monday March 07, 2022 @10:39PM
(#30596188)
>The itch.io response here is uniquely abrasive in the field
"Uniquely abrasive"?? I see you haven't seen all the trash-talking from the Laser-Eyed bros in Twitter.
Re:The technological case against Bitcoin and blockchain
by ludamad on Tuesday March 08, 2022 @10:51PM
(#30610727)
Among official responses from game platforms - what I meant by 'the field'. Note that I personally like the creator of itch and respect his opinion, I just did not think it was a professional use of platform.