News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by znpy on Sunday March 06, 2022 @05:30AM (#30576505)
> and wireless is, well, jammed

Uhm... wouldnt this, like, kill people with a pacemaker ?

I was always told that jammers are dangerous for people with a pacemaker.

Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by dijit on Sunday March 06, 2022 @05:37AM (#30576532)
The way it's usually implemented is two sides of a wall have a mesh in them, similar to chicken wire.

Jams all signals, doesn't require a beacon to be constantly transmitting.

Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by rzzzt on Sunday March 06, 2022 @07:35AM (#30577148)
I'd assumed "jamming" is when something actively disrupts communication, not passively prohibits the signal from reaching its intended recipient, which sounds more like "shielding".

(Maybe this is unnecessary nitpicking, and everyone else understands that it was informal; English is not my first language.)

Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by InCityDreams on Sunday March 06, 2022 @09:53AM (#30577921)
Native English speaker: you're correct (ie, i agree with you).
Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by alufers on Sunday March 06, 2022 @05:47AM (#30576583)
So it's a faraday cage?
Re:NSA Network Infrastructure Security Guidance [pdf] by dijit on Sunday March 06, 2022 @05:49AM (#30576595)
Yes, but part of the infrastructure of the building.