Which I explicitly stated:
"The worst part is, I have no idea what criteria that algorithm is using"
> clearly unintentionally movement
How does a machine know I didn't intend it?
But you do you.
These systems don't trigger for "potentially bad" behavior like speeding, they trigger when you drive like an intoxicated or impaired driver.
Intentionally acting like an impaired drive is like intentionally walking like you're drunk... gravity doesn't care if you were pretending to stumble, you're still coming down.
So it doesn't matter if you intended to veer in and out if your in your lane with barely any steering torque being applied... that's how you cause an accident.
If you were dodging obstacles you'd be applying sharper input than a drunk person. You can't "fake" drunk without being a danger to yourself and others.
What do you think is going to happen, ADAS is going to have a tracking error that makes you look like an impaired driver?
These systems are even starting to take in eyesight and
-
You're like a person going in front of a judge trying to argue:
"Well the officer heard gunshots and watched me, the only person in the room, run away with a smoking gun as the guy fell..."
"But maybe I didn't shoot him!! Maybe I was shooting out the window and felt like going for a run!!"
You're not really going to fool anyone... if it drives like it's impaired, it's impaired. Doesn't matter if it's alcohol, sleep, texting, etc.
"if it drives like it's impaired, it's impaired"
It's just magic I'm supposed to trust.
No thanks.
P.S. I worked on the 757 stabilizer trim design. While I didn't work on the avionics boxes that fitted to it, I know was designed to never allow the software to have the last word. Because software has bugs in it. It always does.
Yes, I know about the 737MAX. There's a switch to turn physically off the stab trim. All the electronics that drive the trim, including MCAS, are upstream of that switch, and that switch rules. Another switch that overrides all the software is the column trim switch. The 3rd crew that experienced MCAS failure that you never hear about used these switches to override MCAS and land safely.
P.P.S. I let my car drift out of the lane if there's no oncoming traffic to give a crazy cyclist / kid on a skateboard more room, or to give that mom with kids more room, or to avoid an icy patch, or to avoid a pothole, or to get my wheels on a drier stretch of pavement to avoid hydroplaning. Heck, if it's safe to do so, I'll move over a full lane to avoid kids.
Not recommending this or proud/bragging/endorsing this, but I drive fast. Too fast. 100 MPH for me is what most people feel doing 5 over.
I have *never* triggered these alerts unless I was genuinely tired.
-
You're talking about a system you don't have the faintest clue about, instead of whipping out irrelevant fantasy situations, ask how it works???
It will *not* react to intentional aggressive movement, it reacts to clearly unintentionally movement that are consistently late and low steering torque.
This is not stuff you can replicate "practicing parallel parking", or driving like you're re-enacting fast and furious!
I expect better of HN, you're jumping from a misleading interpretation to FUD without taking a moment to learn.