News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX reprioritized to cyber defense and overcoming sign... by EarthLaunch on Saturday March 05, 2022 @08:42AM (#30567491)
So the question of effectiveness depends on how easy it is to pump kilowatts of laser energy at a satellite, and how much of that energy reaches the satellite based on dispersion from distance and atmosphere. Needs to be calculated. My guess is that since countries have tried creating laser defenses, someone knows.
Re:SpaceX reprioritized to cyber defense and overcoming sign... by jerf on Saturday March 05, 2022 @09:03AM (#30567685)
Also bear in mind that satellites must be radiation hardened to function at all, because they're already in a high-radiation environment.

I have no doubt a military could build a weapon that could use some form of EMP pulse to completely destroy my cell phone if it were an equivalent distance from a ground-based attack site, in an environment where it wouldn't be simply destroyed. Heck, I wouldn't be surprised there's some researchers who could put something together from their test bench and bits lying around in the lab in a day or two. Doing it to a hardened target is going to be much harder.

Re:SpaceX reprioritized to cyber defense and overcoming sign... by rocqua on Sunday March 06, 2022 @02:21AM (#30575713)
See other comment by me for some basic calculation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30575702

It seems not totally out of the question. My calculation yielded an aperture requirement of 1cm for a blue-ish laser. Which yields a 50m beam at the height of a starlink satelite