Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by hirako2000 on Friday March 04, 2022 @10:04AM
(#30555793)
interesting point of comparison. the much bigger cost of ads is probably the attention loss. we don't have much attention capacity. ads increasingly syphon it. I guestimate that attention loss for an average person is worth order of magnitude more than the extra cpu tearing + bandwidth costs required to run ads. but like for your comparison, most users aren't even realising they are paying a significant mental cost by accepting those ads.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by Nextgrid on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:25AM
(#30556842)
It's not just a mental cost - someone has to pay for those ads and all the machinery & various middlemen that make it possible. That someone is all of us; the prices we pay for most goods include the overhead of polluting society with ads. You end up paying a double tax - a monetary one and an attention one.
Re:Cybercriminals who breached Nvidia issue one of the most ...
by hirako2000 on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:32AM
(#30556936)
agreed. it's multiple costs. and we all pay for that waste and the long term consequences of it.