News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by that_guy_iain on Friday March 04, 2022 @09:53AM (#30555636)
My understanding is the right to deletion doesn't so much affect things such as logs, internal training data, etc.

Also, since that's a web store and the data comes from customer orders they would have no right to deletion as that information becomes protected for other legal requirements.

Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by peterjuras on Friday March 04, 2022 @10:13AM (#30555929)
From a GDPR perspective, it also covers logs, internal training data etc. If a user requires to be deleted, you have to delete everything, there can be no trace of their existence.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by oauea on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:59AM (#30557281)
> If a user requires to be deleted, you have to delete everything, there can be no trace of their existence.

False. Transaction data must be kept for legal reasons and deletion requests do not apply to it.

Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by peterjuras on Friday March 04, 2022 @01:25PM (#30558444)
Yep, that might be true for certain industries.

But logs don't count as the transactional data that needs to be kept for legal reasons.

Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by oauea on Friday March 04, 2022 @01:54PM (#30558807)
That depends entirely on what they're logging and why.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by layer8 on Friday March 04, 2022 @03:54PM (#30560425)
There are always time limits that apply, which means you need to have a process to delete the relevant log entries (or the whole log) eventually.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by oauea on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:37PM (#30564301)
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by that_guy_iain on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:20AM (#30556771)
GDPR, from what the legal trainings I've had, logs aren't covered if you apply the technical requirement and costs, etc.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by morelisp on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:26AM (#30556853)
This also depends on if the data was sensitive and your log usage/retention policy, i.e. you can't just say "it's logs" to be able to keep things - you need to show you're only using them as logs.

Addresses are sensitive information and whatever was happening sounds like multi-purpose-consent-necessary data processing and it was years old.

Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by shadowgovt on Friday March 04, 2022 @11:11AM (#30556669)
There's a reason many of us across the ocean look at that part of the GDPR like someone decided you could put the feathers back in the pillowcase if you just made it illegal for the feathers to be outside the pillowcase.
Re:A GitHub repository was public-viewable by TedDoesntTalk on Friday March 04, 2022 @10:01AM (#30555761)
Are they based in a jurisdiction that has right to deletion laws?