News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Visual Basic) . Parent comment

Re:Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Vis... by gokhan on Thursday September 29, 2011 @04:03PM (#3054032)
Why c# is OK but VB is not? They both have the same feature set with different syntax. VB, as the language, is more powerful at the moment than Java, for example. Got genetics, lambda, linq for years and now async/await. Java OK, VB not? Come on :)
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Vis... by nathanwdavis on Thursday September 29, 2011 @04:12PM (#3054071)
Genetics, cool!! Accounting for genetic drift must be a bitch though.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Vis... by gokhan on Thursday September 29, 2011 @11:48PM (#3055576)
Yep, generics, my bad.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Vis... by Jacob4u2 on Thursday September 29, 2011 @04:50PM (#3054230)
Even though I started this whole religious war thread, I don't really want to continue with it (but I'm too proud to delete my comment). Here is my rebuttal in a nutshell; VB is not succinct and therefore not a powerful language[1].

[1] http://www.paulgraham.com/power.html

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Asynchronous Programming with Async and Await (C# and Vis... by 51Cards on Thursday September 29, 2011 @06:04PM (#3054533)
Succinctness is definitely not the sole measure of programming language's power. If it was then APL would have become mainstream. In that case it actually worked against adoption of the language even though it was very capable otherwise.
[ Parent | on HN ]