> "White supremacist has now become a label for a larger and larger group of republicans/white cisgender traditional-valued people. "

White supremacist beliefs aren't even illegal in the US (whether or not they should be), so the idea that the label of white supremacist itself absent of any other crime is somehow being used to legally prosecute people who are guilty of nothing more than "traditional beliefs" or "being Republican" is quite a stretch.

Not as much of a stretch as placing white supremacists and BLM as category-similar examples, though.

> "it just depends on who is in power"

Also how the law is written.