Almost 11,000 words later and his assessment is:

"The core result was correct."

"This prediction was correct."

"I doubt every claim is exactly correct."

He refused to even acknowledge how wrong he was, much less grapple with how his methods of research and reasoning got it so wrong.

I’ve scanned that 5 mile long article and can’t find any description of what their predictions where other than “it’s going to be worse than what people are saying in March 2020.” What am I missing?