Google mandates workers back to Silicon Valley, other offices from April 4

Re:Google mandates workers back to Silicon Valley, other off... by tick_tock_tick on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @07:04PM (#30535288)

One is legal the other isn't.... This isn't hard you would be committing fraud no questions. Also depending on how you've lied you'd also be on the hook for tax issues to the government rather then just and issue with your company.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google mandates workers back to Silicon Valley, other off... by tomnipotent on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @07:12PM (#30535352)

Did you miss?

> every other citizen following the law

For criminal fraud to happen, there has to be a defrauded party. If I follow my local tax laws and negotiate a better salary with a corporation based on Location A, while potentially living elsewhere at Location B/C/D for prolong periods of time with lower costs of living, that is not fraud.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google mandates workers back to Silicon Valley, other off... by tick_tock_tick on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @07:26PM (#30535462)

Getting the company to enter into a contract under false pretenses is fraud. "intent to deceive" is alone enough. This isn't some kind of gotcha where your technically ok if you do X and Y. Intent matters!

Two parties entered a contract with the understand you would live in location A if you don't that's fraud objectively.

https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/what-is-contr...

https://www.findlaw.com/smallbusiness/business-laws-and-regu...

https://www.upcounsel.com/intent-to-deceive-contract-law#:~:....

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google mandates workers back to Silicon Valley, other off... by tomnipotent on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @07:29PM (#30535485)

The only thing that matters is the legal definition of residence for the location I'm paying taxes.

[ Parent | on HN ]