Re:How generics are implemented in Go 1.18
by twic on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @06:38AM
(#30526192)
I think this is a red herring - compiling to native code is orthogonal to low-levelness. Haskell compiles to native code, but is exceedingly high-level. Forth is traditionally bytecoded, or threaded-coded, but is excruciatingly low-level.
Java was originally bytecoded, but at some point gained various ahead-of-time native compilers. Did it become lower level when that happened? It did not.
Java was originally bytecoded, but at some point gained various ahead-of-time native compilers. Did it become lower level when that happened? It did not.