The perpetrators in real life were Christians but portrayed as Hindus.
The Hindu villagers who in real life helped the victim seek justice are portrayed as casteists who hinder justice.
A lot of literature, news articles and movies are made to exacerbate the problem and create problems where none exist.
1) https://scroll.in/article/876000/is-the-caste-system-deep-ro...
2) https://www.jstor.org/stable/44144111
3) https://www.bbc.com/news/world-south-asia-11229170
4) https://www.hindustantimes.com/india/dalit-catholics-continu...
The leadership of Churches in India remains in the hands of upper-caste Christians, and they are as bad as their Hindu counterparts.
Thanks to social media, this deliberate twisting of facts has come to light, but much of these stories manufactured by the evangelical groups as equally ridiculous as with Christian persecution or Caste atrocities.
Not true, at all. It depends on your state of birth and the caste. A Dalit from a poor state like Bihar is underprivileged than a Dalit of Kerala or Tamil Nadu.
Is it not racist?
As my comments go against the Hindu exceptionalism narrative, he is trying to discredit my comments in whichever way possible.
India is like 3 different countries when sliced by caste. The highest castes are about as privileged as the typical Chinese. The middle are at sub saharan Africa levels. The bottom 25% constitute probably the most deprived population in the world. Better off than the Rohingyas but not by too much.
"Jay Bhim" is a great movie based on a real incident. Bhim refers to the social reformer profiled in the article Bhimrao Ambedkar.
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt15097216/