Re:Norway's sovereign wealth fund to vote against Apple mana...
by s1artibartfast on Sunday February 27, 2022 @06:01PM
(#30493721)
>But i don’t believe they’re doing that job for the pay. Or, not primarily for the pay, they probably wouldn’t do it for free.
Perhaps I misinterpreted you post. If that is your position, than I totally agree.
>So, it’s being put to a vote and they could deny it, and if they do the question is will he walk?
I think that all depends on the alternative proposal. I think they most likely outcome if it passes is that Tim Cook will be offered more money but with a longer lockup schedule. If they came back and said "hey richie, you have enough in the bank and should work for the average salary", I think it is likely he would walk, even if he is not primarily doing it for the money.
Perhaps I misinterpreted you post. If that is your position, than I totally agree.
>So, it’s being put to a vote and they could deny it, and if they do the question is will he walk?
I think that all depends on the alternative proposal. I think they most likely outcome if it passes is that Tim Cook will be offered more money but with a longer lockup schedule. If they came back and said "hey richie, you have enough in the bank and should work for the average salary", I think it is likely he would walk, even if he is not primarily doing it for the money.