News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Residential building struck by a missile in southwestern Kyiv Saturday morning. Parent comment

Re:Residential building struck by a missile in southwestern ... by vl on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:34PM (#30482196)
No, I never said it’s justified. More over, this war is highly unpopular in Russia itself (dictatorship countries can be engaged in unpopular wars). But to understand it you need to look at it from Putin’s perspective: “NATO is explicitly was anti-Soviet, and now is anti-Russian organization. It continues to rapidly expand right next to Russia’s borders. It is a security threat. It deployed nukes in close proximity in the past.” The point is that something unjustified from your perspective is justified from Putin’s perspective.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Residential building struck by a missile in southwestern ... by jacquesm on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:40PM (#30482244)
What Putin's perspective is doesn't really matter though, he will do whatever he wants to do for whatever misguided/crazy reasoning is going on in his head. In the end the only thing that matters is how the rest of the world reacts.

Letting a megalomaniacal dictator that has clearly lost command of his senses run amok, especially when in control of a large nuclear arsenal is a risk we can not really afford, and appeasing such a person will only feed into the cycle of demands.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Residential building struck by a missile in southwestern ... by vl on Saturday February 26, 2022 @06:22PM (#30483122)
> In the end the only thing that matters is how the rest of the world reacts.

But what exactly do you propose?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Residential building struck by a missile in southwestern ... by keymone on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:42PM (#30482253)
> It continues to rapidly expand right next to Russia’s borders

this is bullshit. NATO is not expanding, NATO is not the actor that is able to perform that action, rather it's emergent property of sovereign countries choosing to join NATO.

So who is Putin to tell what sovereign countries can or cannot do? If he's so unhappy with a choice that sovereign country is making with regard to joining a defensive alliance, maybe he should offer something better instead and not behave like a crazy lunatic dictator?

There is nothing valuable in "look at it from Putin's perspective" argument when his perspective is tyrannical.

[ Parent | on HN ]