Grass-fed animals unaffected.

Easy to get if you actually look and are willing to support regenerative farms in order to obtain the best nutrition possible.

I suggest researching into how animals turn grass into nutrients and the difference between crops for human consumption and grass.

Does the guy in OPs statement only eat grass-fed animals? Isn't the source of the grass important? If it is grown in a wild field, maybe it will have all its natural nutrients. But if it is grown as a crop, or on a field under repeated heavy grazing, isn't that just as bad as what is happening to the human crops?

Also, if the guy is going out of his way to only eat the best, most expensive beef, because corn-fed beef is actually bad, why doesn't he do the same thing for fruits and vegetables? You can get "wild grown" vegetables just like you can get wild grazed beef. It just costs more.

I believe he does most of the time. Most people in the carnivore diet are moving to grass fed, otherwise they would be cornivores.

Grass from cows has nature's fertilizer. Good ol shit that replenishes nutrients in the soil.

Welcome to sustainable/regenerative farming.

Because meat has everything humans need? Why eat pesticide and low quality "food" when you don't have to?