Nuclear-fusion reactor doubles record for energy made from fusing atoms

Re:Nuclear-fusion reactor doubles record for energy made fro... by hoelle on Thursday February 24, 2022 @10:00AM (#30455480)

Recommendations include:

1) ditching the toxic negative attitude. It pushes away interest.

2) spend an afternoon or a few bucks on a web designer making your site look better than the "time cube" site. It practically screams crackpot theory.

3) build credibility with academics first. People not in the field will assume you're a swindler by default.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear-fusion reactor doubles record for energy made fro... by pontifier on Thursday February 24, 2022 @02:11PM (#30458872)

1 - I agree, I've been fighting too many battles on too many fronts and my optimism has been taking a hit.

2 - I see, I'll look into presenting more professionally.

3 - I believe Ideas should be evaluated on their merit, and what people think about the idea or myself isn't going to change the physics. It will either work or it won't

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Nuclear-fusion reactor doubles record for energy made fro... by ncmncm on Thursday February 24, 2022 @04:24PM (#30460507)

3 - It could work, but badly. That is what they are shooting for at ITER.

[ Parent | on HN ]