Things you notice when you quit the news (2016)

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by lodovic on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @01:25AM (#30438295)

You keep repeating the Economist is rightwing in this thread, but it seems most here disagree with you. I mean, Fox, Breitbart or the NY Post are pretty much rightwing, and the Economist does not even compare, both in tone and in content. What puts them in the right wing camp according to yo?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by tmnvix on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @01:50AM (#30438423)

Growing up in NZ, If you championed free market capitalism and privatisation, you would definitely be considered right wing. That is the Economist's bread and butter.

That NZ's major left wing party was and is still a big proponent of these policies didn't change that.

Today, it could be argued that neoliberalism has moved the overton window, but many, many people still don't buy it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by hgomersall on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @03:53AM (#30439117)

I'm not sure it does "champion privatisation". I've read some pretty damning reports on bad privatisation, for example about the problems from rail privatisation, as well as on monopolistic practice by big companies. I would say it's rather more nuanced than private good, public bad.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by psd1 on Friday February 25, 2022 @03:49AM (#30465066)

What is "left" and what is "right" is a question of consensus, of course. The Eke is surely considered right-wing in Britain, and likely in most of Europe.

[ Parent | on HN ]