News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by kelp on Tuesday February 22, 2022 @11:13PM (#30437511)
I don't think there is objective agreement that the Economists views are right-wing neoliberal capitalist.

AllSides rates them as "Leans left": https://www.allsides.com/news-source/economist

They've endorsed Democrats for US President since 2004.

Ad Fontes also rates them slightly left leaning: https://adfontesmedia.com/the-economist-bias-and-reliability...

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by tsimionescu on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @01:43AM (#30438389)
As in an old joke that rings true to anyone living outside the US, in US politics you have, on the one hand, an extreme right-wing party, far to the right of anything in other countries; and on the other hand, you have the Republican party.

It's absolutely true that on cultural issues (particularly rights of minorities), the Democratic party and even the Economist is actually left or even far left compared to many world countries.

But on economic matters, the Economist's positions, and indeed Democratic party positions, are indeed far right-wing of what you'll see virtually anywhere else (maybe other 5-eyes countries are getting closer?).

Also, on foreign policy, the media and political parties in the US almost speak with a single voice, which is often, again, far outside mainstream opinion in the rest of the world.

Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by padraic7a on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @08:18AM (#30440628)
Or as the other joke goes;

America is a one party system - the War Party. It's just that as per typical American extravagance they've got two of them.

[dead]
Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by ubercore on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @06:41AM (#30440050)
It's pretty cynical to say something like access to abortion is a "minor semantic detail".
Re:Things you notice when you quit the news (2016) by Lascaille on Wednesday February 23, 2022 @10:19PM (#30449821)
It's a minor semantic detail when you consider their scope of authority.