News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vim 9 will be dedicated to Sven Guckes by sneak on Monday February 21, 2022 @12:35PM (#30418370)
If I am shitting on anything, it is the decision by people currently alive to explicitly endorse his presence in the f/oss community, which is a very poor decision in my view, given Sven's conduct within it.

Telling the truth is always appropriate.

TFA claims that "He was a good person." I do not believe that to be accurate.

Re:Vim 9 will be dedicated to Sven Guckes by jacquesm on Monday February 21, 2022 @12:49PM (#30418537)
I think we have diverging definitions of what the word 'friend' means.

It's possible to be someone's friend, acknowledge their wrongs and not draw attention to those wrongs in their obituary. It's one of those things that have historically been agreed upon as the proper way, in dutch we've formalized it in a proverb "Over de doden niets dan goeds.". "Nothing but good about the dead.". Simply because it is bad form to shit all over someone who isn't there to defend themselves (especially when you call them a friend) and because you never know who is going to read your writings, they might already be having a very hard day. I realize that this is too much to ask for some, but his friends should know better.

Re:Vim 9 will be dedicated to Sven Guckes by rectang on Monday February 21, 2022 @01:00PM (#30418655)
This article isn't an obit, though. Guckes is being elevated by a unique dedication for a prominent FOSS project, and such honors express the values of FOSS culture.
Re:Vim 9 will be dedicated to Sven Guckes by jacquesm on Monday February 21, 2022 @01:02PM (#30418680)
It serves as one because it communicates the fact of his death to a large number of people who probably were not aware of that, and I suspect this is the main reason it got posted here in the first place.
Re:Vim 9 will be dedicated to Sven Guckes by serf on Monday February 21, 2022 @12:43PM (#30418472)
>Telling the truth is always appropriate.

the truth is that Sven was a prolific foss contributor with a complicated history with regards to other people.

you can acknowledge both contributions & faults, erasing his history of foss contributions wouldn't be the truth -- much like labeling him as nothing more than a predator wouldn't be the truth, either.

I'm not sure what you're advocating in this memoriam thread, to be honest -- total erasure of person and non-response from the projects they were involved with?

Isn't that a similar kind of non-whole truth that you're railing against all together?