Re:Google Drive users stung by macOS '.DS_Store' copyright i...
by Mindwipe on Sunday February 20, 2022 @08:52AM
(#30405666)
Banks literally do have to perform money laundering checks on deposit boxes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Drive users stung by macOS '.DS_Store' copyright i...
by volkl48 on Sunday February 20, 2022 @12:22PM
(#30407307)
I don't believe this is correct. You can't launder money with a safe deposit box, so it makes no sense to have to conduct money laundering checks on one.
Standard rental agreements explicitly state that the bank does not retain a key and is unable to open the box (without destroying the lock) in the event that you lose yours.
For example: https://www.bankofamerica.com/content/documents/deposits/saf...
"The bank does not retain duplicate keys for any rented box".
Re:Google Drive users stung by macOS '.DS_Store' copyright i...
by jes on Sunday February 20, 2022 @10:38AM
(#30406522)
Can you say more about this? I have never heard about this.
To my knowledge, my bank cannot access my safe deposit box without my key or without drilling and replacing the lock my key opens.
Am I mistaken about this?
Re:Google Drive users stung by macOS '.DS_Store' copyright i...
by monocasa on Sunday February 20, 2022 @11:45AM
(#30407017)
They have their own copies of the keys.
Re:Google Drive users stung by macOS '.DS_Store' copyright i...
by jamjamjamjamjam on Sunday February 20, 2022 @10:51AM
(#30406599)
Yes