News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Upper limits on partial Dyson spheres in the Milky Way by kragen on Saturday February 19, 2022 @03:03AM (#30395252)
You don't put it on the surface of the star; you orbit at a distance far enough away to maintain a reasonable temperature. Current solar panels are about 300 grams per square meter, but there are much opaquer materials than silicon, so you can probably get down to a hundredth of that. A sphere at the radius of Earth's orbit would be 2.8e23 square meters and thus at 300 grams per square meter 8.4e22 kg. Earth's moon masses 7.3e22 kg, while Jupiter masses 1.90e27 kg. So there's at least five orders of magnitude more raw material than you need.

If you happened to live in a planetary system without adequate gas giants, you could probably find some way to scoop mass off the surface of your star or capture it from coronal mass ejections, then use fusion to transmute it into the materials you need. Even Sun is 1.90e30 kg, and it's rather small as stars go.

Re:Upper limits on partial Dyson spheres in the Milky Way by Smaug123 on Saturday February 19, 2022 @03:37AM (#30395436)
I'm sure you already know this, but GP probably doesn't: I love https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_lifting for very many reasons.

1. "Stellar husbandry". That phrase alone is worth the price of admission.

2. The idea of doing mass spectrometry on a jet of matter coming out of a star to separate it out into streams of hydrogen, deuterium, helium, etc.

3. The idea of creating artificial gas giants as a storage mechanism.

(The list goes on, but 3 is a magic number.)

Re:Upper limits on partial Dyson spheres in the Milky Way by kragen on Saturday February 19, 2022 @03:59AM (#30395542)
I didn't! Thanks!