Re:Sweating the small stuff: Smartwatch developed at UCLA me...
by xivzgrev on Friday February 18, 2022 @10:52PM
(#30394287)
Shut up and take my money! I would find this very useful
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sweating the small stuff: Smartwatch developed at UCLA me...
by bigmattystyles on Friday February 18, 2022 @11:59PM
(#30394543)
Maybe, but the first thing you should think of is Elizabeth Holmes. May her legacy be that everyone is way more skeptical about the viability of any product.
Re:Sweating the small stuff: Smartwatch developed at UCLA me...
by nefitty on Saturday February 19, 2022 @07:58AM
(#30396822)
What Theranos claimed to be capable of is physically impossible. Cursory technical knowledge of the industry would have made it obvious.
I would supplant your comment with, "Be skeptical of the viability of products that relevant experts are skeptical of."
Re:Sweating the small stuff: Smartwatch developed at UCLA me...
by cinntaile on Saturday February 19, 2022 @02:22AM
(#30395078)
I don't see the link between this and Theranos, your reply feels like an unsubstantiated dismissal of this research. This is a device that measures cortisol levels in your sweat, which apparently correlates well to the levels in the blood.