News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by trs8080 on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:52PM (#30392837)
You should really read the article. A hierarchy formed where children were actively being regulated and excluded by other children. The teachers guided a conversation that allowed for everyone to participate equitably.

Your last sentence says a lot. It's sad to expect your children to performatively participate in community but return to selfish behavior when it no longer benefits them.

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by legitster on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:26PM (#30393125)
I did read the article. Did you?

This wasn't one guided conversation - this was months of them. And the children were being recorded and their answers analyzed regularly.

Even if I accepted the diagnosis in the premise, I do not want to take their word about their own results.

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by trs8080 on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:40PM (#30393250)
> This wasn't one guided conversation - this was months of them.

Yes, complex topics often require prolonged discussion. "Conversation" can imply an active exchange over the course of time.

> And the children were being recorded and their answers analyzed regularly.

If you had read the article, you would know that the initial conversation was recorded so the teachers could take notes.

Taking notes and analyzing students' answers is literally part of the job description of a teacher. Teachers are not babysitters, they're educators.