Re:Plausibly deniable encryption (2020)
by noel99 on Friday February 18, 2022 @02:19PM
(#30389944)
Nothing, prison is a warehouse. Remember though all that occurred was property damaged and a level of intimidation that would make a person of sturdy character laugh, on the spectrum of political action it really was not that extreme
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Plausibly deniable encryption (2020)
by causality0 on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:49PM
(#30392806)
I don't think getting fake bombs in the mail would make anybody laugh regardless of their character.
Re:Plausibly deniable encryption (2020)
by sweetbitter on Friday February 18, 2022 @11:18PM
(#30394393)
Only more fragile types (people who care about and/or actually believe in mortality) wouldn't, I wager.
Re:Plausibly deniable encryption (2020)
by bmsleight_ on Saturday February 19, 2022 @06:47AM
(#30396383)
> level of intimidation that would make a person of sturdy character laugh
The intent was for the intimidation to work, so regardless of how sturdy the character. Its hardly a victimless crime.
Marching and demonstrating maybe not as effective, but I find it hard to celebrating trying to harm another person, regardless of how ineffective. Non-violence is a good way to change unjust laws, intimidation is not just.