Re:Haskell2020 Is Dead, but All Hope Is Not Lost (2019)
by tluyben2 on Thursday February 17, 2022 @07:06AM
(#30372216)
IHP is a nice product and works really well for my side project; hopefully I can convince my colleagues to use it for our main project too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Haskell2020 Is Dead, but All Hope Is Not Lost (2019)
by _query on Thursday February 17, 2022 @07:16AM
(#30372259)
Thanks for sharing, really happy to hear this! :)
Re:Haskell2020 Is Dead, but All Hope Is Not Lost (2019)
by nextos on Thursday February 17, 2022 @10:19AM
(#30373970)
Slightly off-topic but how would you convince upper management or a fresh startup to use Haskell? What would be the selling points compared to more mainstream (non-lazy) functional choices?
I'm pretty fluent in Haskell, but finding Haskell jobs is hard compared to OCaml or F#, which are a bit of a niche of their own. Actually, I routinely get OCaml offers when advertising Haskell on my CV. I find this interesting and exciting as OCaml was not very frequent outside academia a few years back.
Re:Haskell2020 Is Dead, but All Hope Is Not Lost (2019)
by throwaway17_17 on Thursday February 17, 2022 @10:52AM
(#30374386)
I think management would have to buy in on developer investment. People who want to work with Haskell, on average, seem quite devoted. I feel like those devs who really want to use Haskell at production scale truly believe in functional programming as a superior endeavor, also, most devs devoted to Haskell also love advanced type systems and are particularly drawn to deeper Haskell the more they do it.
Long statements, but I really do think employee retention and personal fulfillment would lead to a better working environment. So that is the way Iād argue it. Obviously a comprehensive sampling of performance metrics would be needed along with the more HR reasonings, but I think there are plenty of examples where Haskell is performing acceptably.