No one cared about my spreadsheets

Re:No one cared about my spreadsheets by burrows on Thursday February 17, 2022 @02:14AM (#30370360)

> education has inherently unquantifiable value that cannot be expressed in a spreadsheet. Ever.

Any attempt at modeling any phenomena will fail to capture some aspect of that phenomena. So are you suggesting that all attempts at modeling are inherently flawed and must lead to ridiculous conclusions?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No one cared about my spreadsheets by henrikschroder on Thursday February 17, 2022 @02:28AM (#30370441)

- To fully understand poetry, we must first be fluent with its meter, rhyme and figures of speech, then ask two questions: 1) How artfully has the objective of the poem been rendered and 2) How important is that objective? Question 1 rates the poem's perfection; question 2 rates its importance. And once these questions have been answered, determining the poem's greatness becomes a relatively simple matter. If the poem's score for perfection is plotted on the horizontal of a graph--

- O Captain! My Captain!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No one cared about my spreadsheets by burrows on Thursday February 17, 2022 @02:51AM (#30370540)

Right. But I didn’t assert that all things can be gainfully modeled.

I suggested that the non-specific incompleteness of a model isn’t a compelling reason not to use the model.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:No one cared about my spreadsheets by spdionis on Thursday February 17, 2022 @05:02AM (#30371404)

The person you were arguing with is saying that it's a compelling reason to not use the model because, I quote, the conclusions of the model are "batshit insane".

[ Parent | on HN ]