News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elastic and Amazon reach agreement on trademark infringem... by dragonwriter on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @07:51PM (#30368156)
> there's a lot of software that's mostly-open-source-except-Amazon-isnt-allowed-to-run-a-hosted-version-of-it-without-paying-the-authors

That's...not mostly open source. Being able to pay whomever to run a hosted version for you and not have that be exclusive to the original creators isn't, especially in the age when hosted services are in high demand, a peripheral feature of open source. It's integral to the value proposition.

Re:Elastic and Amazon reach agreement on trademark infringem... by skrtskrt on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @08:05PM (#30368291)
I said nothing about having hosting "be exclusive to the original creators"

If AWS/Google/Azure had to pay some fee to the original creators to provide a hosted version, they would definitely do it for a popular enough product.

Everyone would still get all the benefits, except AWS/Google/Azure get a little less money (down from some hundreds of millions) and the creators get a little more than $0.

I fail to see the negative effects on any entity there except what would amount to rounding error in AWS costs. Doesn't actually seem so integral to the value proposition of open source. Definitely seems "mostly open source".

Re:Elastic and Amazon reach agreement on trademark infringem... by pabs3 on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @09:20PM (#30368812)
AWS would just write their own compatible implementation from scratch and still win against the original creators.