Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon
by trasz on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @05:32PM
(#30366738)
Not true. Or rather: in theory what you are saying would be true, however in case of Slack it simply doesn't work: Slack handles unreliable transport worse than IRC - IRC never dropped or duplicated messages; you could reconnect to IRC client under a tmux session from anywhere and it would do the right thing.
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon
by shadowgovt on Thursday February 17, 2022 @12:13AM
(#30369744)
> you could reconnect to IRC client under a tmux session from anywhere
That would actually be a pretty decent solution if it could be automated on a mobile device: run the IRC client in the cloud and then have tmux auto-reestablish every time it gets its connection dropped while the mobile device moves around.
I'd have to see it in action to be confident that a continuously-dropping-and-reestablishing tmux won't drop incoming messages or double-send though.
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon
by trasz on Thursday February 17, 2022 @03:38PM
(#30378352)
People (like me) have been doing this for over two decades now. It's quite well tested :-)
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon
by shadowgovt on Friday February 18, 2022 @01:31AM
(#30382758)
Excellent! Do you have a link to a write-up on how to set it up?
OP's assertions it was more reliable are assuming a very static network. Modern protocols (Slack included) are far, far more reliable on a highly-unreliable transport layer.