News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by jermaustin1 on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @12:38PM (#30362968)
Launching into the sun is a VERY difficult achievement. So far we've launched one solar probe, and dozens of other probes. It launched back in 2018, and still has 3.5 years before it will actually reach the sun.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by dr_orpheus on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @02:04PM (#30364242)
Yes, for reference the capability of the Delta IV Heavy [0] (which launched the Parker Solar probe) is ~28,000 kg in to LEO. And the Parker solar probe [1] was only 685 kg. I don't know how close to the limit of the mass this is to get in to this orbit, but it still gives you an idea of the capability to get something to the Sun versus in to LEO.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_IV_Heavy

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Solar_Probe

Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by s1artibartfast on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @11:06PM (#30369410)
Going to the sun is easy, going there fast is hard. You could put a tiny ion thruster on it and get it there in a million years
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by shadowgovt on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @03:49PM (#30365487)
It is, indeed, way cheaper to fling it into space beyond the solar system with the right planetary alignment.
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by thfuran on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @01:18PM (#30363550)
We don't actually much care about when trash would hit the sun. But yes, it's a huge delta v compared to just getting to orbit.
Re:A bevy of rovers heading for the Moon by skykooler on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @04:44PM (#30366177)
Adding a long duration deep space maneuvering system to allow the trash to precisely navigate the necessary gravity assists would also be far from feasibly economical.