News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by paulpauper on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:29PM (#30351432)
odious as tech nerds improvising themselves as politicians, epidemiologists, microbiologists, logistics experts and activists just because they know how to use Google and follow some people on Twitter.

What is wrong with people do their own research, seeking their own info? Health experts, the mainstream media, and politicians do not have a monopoly on truth, and were wrong any times about Covid.

Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by ativzzz on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @05:34PM (#30353809)
Generally because 99% of people are not researchers and when they say "doing their own research" they mean reading a few blogs and facebook posts. Reading actual papers done by researchers is a step above that, of which a few people will skim maybe one paper.
Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by blindmute on Wednesday February 16, 2022 @09:48AM (#30360620)
What makes you think that? How do you know they are reading Facebook and not reading the papers? From what I've seen on HN, people commenting contrarian studies have actually read them.
Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by dageshi on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:51PM (#30351719)
I read through a lot of those threads, there wasn't much of value there, just angry people shouting at each other mostly. I'm not saying it should be banned, but I too stopped reading them eventually because what's the point?
Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by ido on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:34PM (#30351494)
Just gently pointing out that you’re inviting the same heated discussion warned about above you.
Re:I love you, Hacker News, but you’re toxic by paulpauper on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @02:39PM (#30351558)
I'm just disputing the notion that only experts are right. It's not about being pro-mask or anti-mask or pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine