Re:Case against OOP is understated, not overstated (2020)
by Supermancho on Tuesday February 15, 2022 @01:43PM
(#30350809)
> Whose meta-analysis came up with that? Like to see that.
You'll have to dig into each language that has expanded it's composition capability and the reasoning, but the outcome is self-evident. Many languages started with simple inheritance (eg PHP, Java, VB, C++, et al) and expanded composability mechanisms over time.
> That's a bold statement (unless you have a novel definition of "cross cutting concerns") and actually backwards: ... A cross cutting concern is a 'general' concern.
I'm not going to argue about how you wish to redefine things.
You'll have to dig into each language that has expanded it's composition capability and the reasoning, but the outcome is self-evident. Many languages started with simple inheritance (eg PHP, Java, VB, C++, et al) and expanded composability mechanisms over time.
> That's a bold statement (unless you have a novel definition of "cross cutting concerns") and actually backwards: ... A cross cutting concern is a 'general' concern.
I'm not going to argue about how you wish to redefine things.
Good luck with whatever.