depending on how the survey was asked, just because 1/3 supports X it does not necessarily follow that 2/3 are against X

Funny you said that, because it just so happens that in last two election "2/3 were against Justin Trudeau" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Canadian_federal_election

Sometimes. Leaders arent just supposed to follow though, they have to lead too. Knowing when to do which is the mark of a great leader.

Apply this to any other minority and tell me how it reads.

This is a matter of policy; not race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, family status, genetic characteristics, or disability all of which are well protected by the Canadian Bill of Rights.

Please don't try to conflate vaccination policy to the level of human rights.

> Please don't try to conflate vaccination policy to the level of human rights.

What you just said is:

> Please don't try to conflate medical human rights to the level of human rights.

The fact you can't clearly see that is staggering. People have a right to decide whether or not they want a medical procedure. This is absolutely no different than forced sterilization during the eugenics movement. A group of people in power, absolutely sure of their correctness, are trying to force medical procedures on people.

I can't believe we haven't learned this lesson yet.