News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Life of MS-DOS by hulitu on Sunday February 13, 2022 @02:21PM (#30324696)
Taken into account how the modern compilers evolved, i don't have big hopes. They seem to become more bloated with every release.
Re:The Life of MS-DOS by oso2k on Sunday February 13, 2022 @04:10PM (#30325718)
gcc-ia16 and OpenWatcom are both modern compilers that generate as good a set of code as any compiler ever did for Pentium and older processors. But using a higher level language like C means there’s more than one compiler that can compile your DOS. That’s a reason to be hopeful if you’re a DOS developer.
Re:The Life of MS-DOS by boznz on Sunday February 13, 2022 @05:50PM (#30326397)
The compilers have probably got better but the C language has definitely bloated since the 80s
Re:The Life of MS-DOS by ok123456 on Sunday February 13, 2022 @02:24PM (#30324725)
constexpr code and move semantics didn't exist until relatively recently. These are steps towards less bloat and more aggressive optimization. They also can elide gratuitous copy construction.

There are a lot of these little optimizations that are found in modern compilers that you could only dream about in 1991.