Re:Swiss back further restrictions on tobacco advertising
by oh_sigh on Sunday February 13, 2022 @02:00PM
(#30324491)
Science would have banned/heavily taxed eggs in the 80s. Does science inform us about addictive products above and beyond what our every day observations tell us?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Swiss back further restrictions on tobacco advertising
by sdoering on Sunday February 13, 2022 @03:58PM
(#30325616)
The level of evidence about eggs was spurious at best even in the 80ies. As with a lot of food science preliminary studies and ideas get overblown in media.
But at least the scientists I know would wait for the level of evidence to be high.
But as policies would be made by politicians I doubt it would work without populistic influences.
Re:Swiss back further restrictions on tobacco advertising
by throwaway2037 on Sunday February 13, 2022 @08:52PM
(#30327594)
Yes, I remember the endless LDL and HDL cholesterol public health debates in the 1980s, especially arounds chicken eggs. When I was older, I learned that the Japanese consume a phenomenal amount of eggs per capita -- over 300 per year(!). (Raw egg over rice is a common breakfast dish.) Yet, the Japanese have much lower incidence of heart disease (per capita) than the United States. The reasons are multi-factor -- not all of which are understood.