News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sci-Hub statistics and database by generationP on Saturday February 12, 2022 @03:38PM (#30316156)
I have a hunch that the downfall of the "Plato" real-time downloader wasn't the Indian court case but rather the fact that it helped publishers trivially identify the university accounts through which the downloads were happening. Even if the appearance of papers were delayed by a random number of days, there are other pitfalls now, and most importantly, publishers started caring. In particular, Elsevier now slaps UUIDs onto all PDFs you download from them, and no, I'm not just talking of visible watermarks. Other publishers seem to be doing similar things (there was a recent twitter thread on this, retweeted by @textfiles, which I can't find). The rational solution for Sci-Hub seems to be to buffer their uploads and release them in yearly batches, maybe programmatically removing various kinds of watermarks and diffing against the same paper downloaded from a second IP. If this is what they are doing, I'm not surprised. Not sure how much of a winning strategy they have in the long run, though.

Guys: post your papers on the arXiv.

Re:Sci-Hub statistics and database by mohammad_ali85 on Saturday February 12, 2022 @04:31PM (#30316710)
This might be the twitter thread you’re referring to? https://twitter.com/json_dirs/status/1486120144141123584
Re:Sci-Hub statistics and database by anon_123g987 on Sunday February 13, 2022 @07:07AM (#30321177)
Re:Sci-Hub statistics and database by generationP on Saturday February 12, 2022 @04:32PM (#30316721)
Yep, thank you!