Re:Ask HN: Browser-extension creators, how do you write for ...
by OptionX on Saturday February 12, 2022 @02:50PM
(#30315705)
It's axiomatic based on its self-evident nature.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ask HN: Browser-extension creators, how do you write for ...
by catlifeonmars on Saturday February 12, 2022 @08:27PM
(#30318198)
Can you clarify? What is self evident? Plenty of people use Chrome without blockers. Maybe their browsing experience is subpar, but “unusable” is categorically false.
Re:Ask HN: Browser-extension creators, how do you write for ...
by OptionX on Monday February 14, 2022 @02:22PM
(#30336905)
Taken from Merriam-Webster:
>not capable of being used or fit for use : not usable
And their example:
>The lavatory, totally unusable, was full of snow which had blasted in through the keyhole.
Which is categorically false of course because you can very well do your business before hypothermia sets in.
Re:Ask HN: Browser-extension creators, how do you write for ...
by throwawaynay on Sunday February 13, 2022 @05:11PM
(#30326158)
using a fork to eat soup is possible
Re:Ask HN: Browser-extension creators, how do you write for ...
by catlifeonmars on Sunday February 13, 2022 @07:34PM
(#30327140)
Indeed. To stretch that analogy a bit further, spoons can be seen as a new technology which pushes the cost-benefit curve out. As with all new technologies, adoption can be gradual. For a time, lots of people will continue to eat soup with forks, until soup browsers begin shipping with spoons by default.