News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sustainability with Rust by sodality2 on Saturday February 12, 2022 @11:11AM (#30313824)
WASM is more efficient than JS...
Re:Sustainability with Rust by culi on Saturday February 12, 2022 @11:13AM (#30313839)
I think they were just pointing out that software architecture will usually make a much bigger impact on efficiency and energy usage than language choice

A bloated app is wasteful no matter what language its in

Re:Sustainability with Rust by sodality2 on Saturday February 12, 2022 @11:19AM (#30313880)
Ah, okay, that makes sense :D I agree
Re:Sustainability with Rust by Jcampuzano2 on Saturday February 12, 2022 @11:36AM (#30314024)
It highly depends on what the use case is.

For most use cases JS is still more performant than WASM unless you're doing a lot of very heavy number crunching which the vast majority of WebApps aren't.

Browser vendors have done a ton to make JS fast.

Re:Sustainability with Rust by habibur on Saturday February 12, 2022 @11:18AM (#30313879)
> WASM is more efficient than JS...

Last time I checked it wasn't. That's a few years back. I would be really happy if it is now.

Re:Sustainability with Rust by hu3 on Saturday February 12, 2022 @01:36PM (#30315061)
WASM does not have native access to DOM for starters.