Re:Peloton replaces CEO and lays off 2,800 people
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @11:54AM
(#30260846)
I don't see it as rent seeking since there are production costs to these classes but $40 is way too high. $2 is more like it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Peloton replaces CEO and lays off 2,800 people
by thebigman433 on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @12:06PM
(#30261027)
2$/month would pay for nothing essentially. You get unlimited classes for the 40$/month, which is cheaper than going to most fitness classes more than a few times.
Even in the middle of my small town, drop in classes at the gym at 8$ each, on top of your monthly membership.
Fwiw I dont own a Peloton, I prefer running, I just dont think its nearly as bad of a deal as people make it out to be
Re:Peloton replaces CEO and lays off 2,800 people
by 2OEH8eoCRo0 on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @12:30PM
(#30261425)
I'm not a user either but $40 at their current subscriber number comes in at a quarter billion dollars of revenue. How come everything else takes advantage of economies of scale but not virtual goods? $2 a month at scale would be great. Even greater if they allowed you to log into any of a number of fitness video services.
Re:Peloton replaces CEO and lays off 2,800 people
by austinprete on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @01:25PM
(#30262307)
From Peloton’s point of view (bottom line yadda yadda), you’d have to think that dropping to this price would 20X their subscriber count. Which is not to say that $40 is the correct profit maxima, but it almost certainly isn’t $2.
Just because something can be offered cheaper at scale, doesn’t mean it should or needs to be.