Re:Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
by adrn10 on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @05:53AM
(#30256994)
Basically, our association is trying to move away from file systems, for scalability and availability purposes.
There's a similarity between RDBMS (say SQL) and filesystems, in the sense that they distribute like crap. Main reason being that they have too strong consistency properties.
Although, one can use Garage as a file system, notably using WebDAV. It's a beta feature, called Bagage: https://git.deuxfleurs.fr/Deuxfleurs/bagage
I'll let my knowledgeable fellows answer, if you'd like to hear about differences between seaweedfs and Garage in more detail :)
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
by ddorian43 on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @06:02AM
(#30257049)
seaweedfs is an object storage at the core. In my (personal) case, I disqualify cause of missing erasure coding.
Re:Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
by StillBored on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @11:50AM
(#30260794)
Garage says isn't a goal either.
https://garagehq.deuxfleurs.fr/documentation/design/goals/
"Storage optimizations: erasure coding or any other coding technique both increase the difficulty of placing data and synchronizing; we limit ourselves to duplication."
Re:Garage, our self-hosted distributed object storage solution
by Already__Taken on Tuesday February 08, 2022 @07:15PM
(#30266750)
Maybe they added it since you looked or did something not match your needs? https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/wiki/Erasure-coding-f...