> the apparent centralization of web3 being supposed to be p2p, there are several different web3 providers (eth, poly, ipfs) with different incentives.

> a pessimistic example of what's possible with web3 tech.

I want to engage on these points in good faith. I'm asking you to expand these because I'm curious.

I think crypto economics are a blight in practice, while the theory might be sound.

You've presented a head and no body work, and I am genuinely curious to hear the expansion.