News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin's fungibility graveyard by magicjosh on Saturday February 05, 2022 @05:54PM (#30227177)
Happy to hear more about your experience!

To answer your question, what I've read about Lightning it sounded convoluted. The need to have a watcher keeping a channel open, invoices, just seems overly complex. I have tried receiving sats from online Lightning faucets and that part was impressive.

Ethereum's L1 growth and improvements seem more logical to me.

Is there a good place to go to track the adoption of Lightning?

Re:Bitcoin's fungibility graveyard by mw888 on Saturday February 05, 2022 @06:52PM (#30227646)
Kind of strange to call Lightning convoluted and then cite Ethereum as a foil. Lightning is much simpler than what Ethereum is trying to do, and evidently so when you compare progress on each so far.
Re:Bitcoin's fungibility graveyard by aspenmayer on Saturday February 05, 2022 @06:06PM (#30227271)
Lightning was recently added to Cash App, for one big corp fiat onramp/offramp example.
Re:Bitcoin's fungibility graveyard by magicjosh on Saturday February 05, 2022 @06:22PM (#30227409)
2022 is off to an interesting start!

"Block’s Cash App adopts Lightning Network for free bitcoin payments" https://techcrunch.com/2022/01/18/blocks-cash-app-adopts-lig...